|
|
SUCCESS STORY #4
Copper Operation, United
States
Max Emitter use results in 25% copper extraction increase, and results proven in repeated/identical tests.
A copper operation in the U.S. was still using a sprinkler system for heap
leaching – but management wanted to investigate the use of drip emitters to
see if there was any difference between the two methods of leaching. A
considerable amount of planning and effort went into the test preparation.
First, a drainage system was constructed under the two identical leach areas
that would be used in the test. The drainage systems would be used to take
PLS (pregnant leach solution) samples every 8-hours throughout the test.
Second, the mine was instructed to alternate trucks to the two leach areas
to have as homogenous an ore blend as possible. Third, the test was
conducted using the same application rate, so the Max-Emitter flow rate and
spacing on the tubing and on the header was designed to match the
application rate with the sprinkler system.
Once the ore was dumped and the two leach systems installed and started,
solution began reporting on the sprinkler area after only one day. The
Max-Emitter drip emitter area took 5-days for solution to report. PLS grade
on the sprinkler area was lower than on the Max-Emitter area at solution
breakthrough and actually for the entire test.
Why this difference with identical leach solution application rates?
Investigating this test and previous tests comparing sprinklers and drip
emitters has shown that sprinkler systems tend to channel through the leach
area and not wet all of the ore. With the drip emitters, capillary action
pulls the solution into all the ore and voids and crevices before gravity
pulls it to the bottom of the leach area. By wetting all of the ore with
the Max-Emitter, more copper is leached from the ore and higher extractions
are experienced.
In this test, the sprinkler area recovered approximately 60% of the total
copper in the heap (70% of the acid and cyanide soluble copper) and the
Max-Emitter recovered approximately 80% of the total copper in the heap (90%
of the acid and cyanide soluble copper), a 25% increase in total copper
extraction. Management could not believe the results, they seemed
unrealistic that the Max-Emitter system could provide a 25% improvement in
copper extraction over sprinklers – so a second test was conducted – with
almost identical results, although the copper extraction difference was even
higher than in the first test. An additional benefit of the Max-Emitter
system over a sprinkler system is reduced evaporation losses. In arid
regions of the U.S. or South America for example, the Max-Emitter system can
reduce evaporation losses by almost 50%, reducing fresh water makeup to the
leach system by the same amount.
Water savings at many operations is critical because at some mines in South
America, the most expensive reagent at the mine is fresh water.
Any operation using sprinklers should
immediately look at a similar test to evaluate the potential benefits from
the Max-Emitter.
|